Index of articles from the Blog |
Animals |
Anthropology & Archaeology |
Art & Cinema |
Biography |
Books & Authors |
Culture |
Economics |
Environment |
Fiction & Poetry |
History |
Humor |
Justice |
Philosophy |
Photography |
Politics |
Religion |
Science |
Travel |
Books by
Books by
|
By vp | Jun 2007 | Comments
Cross-posted from Neutral Observer. Do we arrive at our beliefs in a systematic manner or through an intuitive process ? Are we predisposed towards some beliefs while being skeptical about others? Do life experiences play a strong role in what we believe ? Does scientific training enable us to develop a method for deciding what to believe ? Or is it that rationalists are born, not made? Is there a commonly accepted set of methods for deciding the truth value of claims? A clutch of these questions occurred to me recently, when I got into an argument. It all started innocently enough, with my brother telling me about the healing powers of a newly prominent Indian guru known as Baba Ramdev. He told me of televised meetings where people would stand up from a crowd and report relief from crippling pain and/or debilitating disease, thanks to the Baba's recommended regimen of breathing exercises known as Pranayam. Provoked by the description, I said that all this was a fraud. An argument ensued, in which the testimonies of reputed individuals (a neurosurgeon from the US, an army general's wife) were described to me. I was told that the Baba makes no money from these yoga camps and that I should not presume fraud. Additionally, it was pointed out that it was arrogant and presumptuous on my part to dismiss something without giving it due consideration. After considerable huffing and puffing, we finally settled it for the night by agreeing to check back in a couple of years on the Baba's progress. I was only peripherally aware of Baba Ramdev's name, having been in India when there was a media sensation due to allegations of ground animal remains in medicines made and sold by organizations affiliated with the Baba. The allegations came from Brinda Karat of the Communist Party of India, but the government of Uttaranchal, the state where the Baba's organization is based, refuted them. Since then, the Baba's fame seems to have grown. He is now featured on half a dozen TV channels and has quite a nifty website. He has also conducted a Pranayam camp in the UK. When I was thinking later about the whole argument, it occurred to me that I may have been hasty in proclaiming fraud. There may be several reasons to withhold judgment when we come across seemingly inexplicable curative powers:
Medicine is by no means unique in presenting issues that are difficult to evaluate or reject offhand. One topical example is that of global warming. While the basic ideas of heat-trapping gases are easy enough to follow and accept, the actual evidence of temperature rises is in the form of detailed empirical data. The predictions are based on sophisticated computer-based models of climate change. Given that most of us have do not have the wherewithal or the desire to check the data and models for ourselves, we are left with no choice but to accept the wisdom of scientists working in the discipline. Further, several scientific disciplines are sufficiently complex that immediate acceptance or refutation of claims is tough, even if you have advanced training in the discipline. Here are some (admittedly difficult) examples related to my academic background:
The first two claims in this list would evoke immediate skepticism, but the third one does not. It turns out however, that the third one is the only one clearly known to have resulted from a falsification of data. The first two (sets of) claims are unsupported by repeatable experiments. In these and many other cases, you as an individual have to depend on the testimony of those you consider reliable. My point in going off on this tangent is that the world is complex and reliable testimony is a perfectly valid basis for belief. In that case, why does the testimony of reputedly upright people fail to convince me of the curative powers of Pranayam as taught by Baba Ramdev, whereas my brother tended to believe in them ? To get back to the questions at the beginning of the post, I think that:
I know that each of these is a contentious assertion. Taking a cue from a 17th century French lawyer, I have to tell you that I have truly marvellous proofs of these propositions which this blog post is too narrow to contain. |
Designed in collaboration with Vitalect, Inc. All rights reserved. |
|